Unless you're extremely thick and completely reflect all incoming data, then you too could experience the wonders of understanding something based on months and months of observable data across millions of people.
I think enough to finally cause measurable outrage, as what happened with YouTube. Correction was made early on in response to that, and again later with Self-Certification being implemented. If the problems persist in this more confined space years from now, perhaps AI is bust.
-
-
It seems that, at least right now, human interference is needed to make learning AI work properly. What I don't know is what late-stage learning AI in this magnitude would look like. It's an unknown, but in the case of YouTube compared to drones it's at least controllable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't see an issue with being more proactive. I'm operating under the assumption that anyone at YT still understands what's actually happening with their algorithm at this point. If not then I agree they're being flagrantly irresponsible. The AI is already doing complex stuff.
- 5 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.