Common sense, YT's own statements, observable data since its induction, and most importantly watching the human response to the algorithm when it makes a mistake. Such as this. If you're not able to understand this and need to ask I don't think you're capable of understanding.
If you created the confines of your algorithm responsibly and reversibly, as YouTube has, I don't think any shouldering of blame is necessary as you can simply hit the reset button and fix it.
-
-
If YouTube's algorithm was made to permanently censor media irreversibly without confines, I think then the core problem would have been exacerbated to the point of extremity and the backlash would have been so profound as to go beyond customers to call for justice.
-
Though there have been examples of drone strikes killing innocents, with the families having little or no recourse. In those cases it seems that no punishment was ever really received on the end of the perpetrators. Too few directly affected witnesses. Hard to correlate on YT.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, not its initial application. Though that was some time ago, and the cases in which it false-flags aren't even comparable to its initial implementation. Any learning algorithm comes with a risk, though if it's contained within their product they still can control the outcome.
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.