Common sense, YT's own statements, observable data since its induction, and most importantly watching the human response to the algorithm when it makes a mistake. Such as this. If you're not able to understand this and need to ask I don't think you're capable of understanding.
A life is not something that can be returned such as media, so the correlation can't be directly made. The algorithm would also likely never be so poorly conceived as to have a command to "kill" in specific.
-
-
If you created the confines of your algorithm responsibly and reversibly, as YouTube has, I don't think any shouldering of blame is necessary as you can simply hit the reset button and fix it.
-
If YouTube's algorithm was made to permanently censor media irreversibly without confines, I think then the core problem would have been exacerbated to the point of extremity and the backlash would have been so profound as to go beyond customers to call for justice.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think that the algorithm can't be blamed until it can, if that makes sense. If there's no way to reach the human who is supposed to be responsible for correcting it, then the algorithm they made and put faith in is at fault for not adapting properly to their designs.
- 4 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.