Common sense, YT's own statements, observable data since its induction, and most importantly watching the human response to the algorithm when it makes a mistake. Such as this. If you're not able to understand this and need to ask I don't think you're capable of understanding.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AmazonFCBryan @meedeeums and
Same question, same answer. The scientific process goes Hypothesis -> Theory. A Hypothesis is the supposition, a Theory is the explanation of something based on the observable data at hand. The things scientists use to describe replicable "fact".
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NekoBlanchard @meedeeums and
Unless you're extremely thick and completely reflect all incoming data, then you too could experience the wonders of understanding something based on months and months of observable data across millions of people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AmazonFCBryan @meedeeums and
You're right I think I'm reaching here. Let me reset on why I think intent is necessary.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NekoBlanchard @meedeeums and
If you go off the definition of Censor: "an official who examines material that is about to be released, such as books, movies, news, and art, and suppresses any parts that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NekoBlanchard @meedeeums and
If the base noun requires someone to enact the censorship willingly and the outcome is intended permanence, I do think that intention to permanently sever access to that media is required for it to be labeled as censorship.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NekoBlanchard @meedeeums and
The fire he's burning the books with isn't committing censorship, it's doing what it was intended to do. The human holding the torch is the one committing censorship. If they realized they burned something unintentionally and returned it, I don't believe it's censorship.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
However if that torch, or in this case the AI, went on a rampage irreversibly burning every trace across the internet despite intention to stop it, then I think the lack of intention would finally fit the definition.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.