The algorithm, obviously, does not intend to remove content that does not invade privacy, threaten, harass nor anything else written within the Terms of Service. You know that a learning algorithm needs to make mistakes to learn, and humans need to correct the mistakes.
If the base noun requires someone to enact the censorship willingly and the outcome is intended permanence, I do think that intention to permanently sever access to that media is required for it to be labeled as censorship.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
A life is not something that can be returned such as media, so the correlation can't be directly made. The algorithm would also likely never be so poorly conceived as to have a command to "kill" in specific.
- 6 more replies
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.