Disregarding the fact that you didn't respond to how the supposed censorship was accidental and hence returning, the obvious response you're looking for would be hyperbolic; something all-encompassing that can't be taken literally since unintentional removal is reversed.
The algorithm, obviously, does not intend to remove content that does not invade privacy, threaten, harass nor anything else written within the Terms of Service. You know that a learning algorithm needs to make mistakes to learn, and humans need to correct the mistakes.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Common sense, YT's own statements, observable data since its induction, and most importantly watching the human response to the algorithm when it makes a mistake. Such as this. If you're not able to understand this and need to ask I don't think you're capable of understanding.
- 15 more replies
-
-
-
Now if your definition extends to actions upon Terms of Service violations causing true censorship on the vast internet, then that's an entirely different situation to the one H3 was contending with.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.