the statement that there are many senses of 'world' or 'atheism' (or 'theism' or 'god' for that matter) and so we should encounter those various senses/meanings differently seems sensible to me actually
I can go along with this account to a certain extent. But to say '*this* is *red*', you need adversaries in the logical sense. What is 'this' and what does 'red' imply in an inferential interaction framework?
-
-
i think there’s a complex phenomenon that roughly maps onto the concept of ‘red.’ ‘This’ is a deixis (proof if anything that words can mean multiple things). When you explicitly state that you fight against “every sense” of the word “muslim,” that implicates every sense
-
among the most prominent of which senses is simply a submitter to God. As Goethe said, “if this be Islam, do we not all live in Islam?” So I’m surprised you would emphasize that you “fight against every sense” of the world muslim but believe in God
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
