that’s a funny response— since your reading is an unqualified projection of your own beliefs my response must be a form of “islamism” lol. If by Babouyeh you mean al-Qummi, he was at most a toddler by the time of Hallaj’s death, so his influence must have been quite supernatural
If you are a pragmatist proponent of meaning then all good, but then you can't ignore adversarial games either.
-
-
The problem with many religious people is that they want have the pragmatic cake of meaning-as-use but without the ingredients and actions that go into making it. It's not going happen without a lot of gerrymandering.
-
not sure what the ingredients of meaning are in this analogy and how that relates to religion. If anything I would say that religious people are prone prone to essentialism (or ‘ingredientism’) and approaching meanings ontologically rather than epistemologically
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
