I don't see how that is, though? there's nothing "digital" about differentiation or integration, they're both just limits. just like e is a limit and not its digital representation, and can be computed digitally _or_ analoguely
-
-
Replying to @jancorazza
You seem to confuse between two things, math modeling and computational modeling. Math modeling is not computation in any meaningful sense.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @jancorazza
Without notions such effectivity (weak or strong) and computational complexity constrains, you are not talking about computation at all.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @jancorazza
Similar query. I have watched you refer to complexity science constraints (always both positive & negative, ofc) several times in seminars—& yet I have never seen you elucidate what such constraints might entail, in any context. Reading recs? Examples?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @exhyletics @jancorazza
Sure. What counts as the canonical def. of a complex system these days is what you might call statistical complexity or structural stability. There are many formalizations for it but one of the most adequate ones is Ellison-machine reconstruction, so what is it?...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The ε-machine reconstruction is how a system predicts by predicting its future via reconstructing its past states. Think of it as a machine that emits X and Y or 0 and 1 in machine language. The best reconstruction is the one that follows the formal definition of Occam's razor.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So then you can think of a complex system as a system capable of retaining its past states or what is called generative entrenchment (tradition anyone?). Now the more (past) reconstructions you have the more you are constrained as a system? How?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
In two ways, the rate of variation begins to decrease as the entrenched constraints increase like in evolution. This is negative constraint on vacation. But then there is a positive constraint in the sense that some functions might evolve which are within the given system.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Variation not vacation, I should just turn off the autocorrect at this point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This idea between negative and positive constraints shouldn't be mapped onto vertical and horizontal modularities. This used to be a classic example but not anymore: people used to cite examples including myself that entrenchment is more like building a wall.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If you lay the first layer in the wrong way you get a crooked wall. While this is a layman-friendly example re the underlying constraints, it's not relevant.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @jancorazza
I think I’ll have to read the Bechtel. Mapping them that way wasn’t my first impulse, but I can see why that trend would exist. I don’t think I had any context-independent mapping in mind other than a simply vertical one: top-down entrenchment, bottom-up sui generis factors.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.