Zalamea is a gentleman. But is this enough? Is this what we actually want: a sheaf of romantic vagaries where all math fields become the expressions of the sublime? Sheaves everywhere=tender-heart ontological hypothesization?
-
-
yes, I would say it is a misconstrual to say "sheaves are everywhere". I would say rather that you can construct many sheaves that can serve many different kinds of purposes.
-
"Sheaves are everywhere" is akin to "isomorphisms are everywhere". they are trivially true in the sense that if you look for it you'll find it. that does not mean that anything that correlates with anything else have cognitive purchase, precisely because of its ubiquity.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.