Zalamea is a gentleman. But is this enough? Is this what we actually want: a sheaf of romantic vagaries where all math fields become the expressions of the sublime? Sheaves everywhere=tender-heart ontological hypothesization?
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
I feeling like someone is avoiding a Skype call/fist-fight over this
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @great_old_ones_
You know my Skype id, I'm waiting like a parasite hungry for a potential host.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
Bring it on! That being said: you got a point here, for sure, but you are also giving an uncharitable reading of the poor man, conflating the romantic and tender-hearted side of his work (which, as you know, I like a lot, but I can see the potential limitations).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @great_old_ones_
I love him, but to think he is some sort of savior is by all accounts misguided.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
Who does though? Is there a Church of Zalamea I'm not aware of?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
There is. My issue with him is an unhinged romanticism. I remember we were in event and he said to me this is the worst event. The day after he told me 'we should have more poetry'.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.