Zalamea is a gentleman. But is this enough? Is this what we actually want: a sheaf of romantic vagaries where all math fields become the expressions of the sublime? Sheaves everywhere=tender-heart ontological hypothesization?
-
-
Bring it on! That being said: you got a point here, for sure, but you are also giving an uncharitable reading of the poor man, conflating the romantic and tender-hearted side of his work (which, as you know, I like a lot, but I can see the potential limitations).
-
I love him, but to think he is some sort of savior is by all accounts misguided.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.