The greatest AI philosophers:
-
-
-
Replying to @CipollaMatthew
Are you some unholy geek? That name hasn't been uttered for decades. But yes.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
Well since everyone was throwing out names on the given topic I figured why not at least mention one of the fathers of cybernetics (technically the father of second order cybernetics) lol???

and lets just say I try my best to know my domains of inquiry 


...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CipollaMatthew @NegarestaniReza
Eh, the father of second order cybernetics in name only but as far as Shannon-Ashby treatment of information as environmental adequation goes, arguably less impactful in the history of AI.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EkinErkan4 @NegarestaniReza
Never said how influential he was... was just stating someone who is generally overlooked but had some important things to say...and I mean it’s quite obvious just how impactful Shannon-Ashby are in regards to information theory, computation/computer sci in general....
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CipollaMatthew @EkinErkan4
Ekin, Shannon and Ashby were hip names but the actual work was being performed by fundamentally different figures: Carl Adam Petri, Rob Milner and others.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Nothing was pivotal to theo-comp science than the formation of true concurrency. People could say everything about information exchange and computation but suddenly it hit them: So what about complex concurrent problems? To this day, Dijkstra's dining philosophers is unresolved.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @CipollaMatthew
Ah yes the Hindley-Milner system; someone has to take up the type inference-as-Brandomian commitment angle vs type-checking as normative scenario decidables. But I dont know enough about Milner aside from I should read more
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Milner, Petri, Japaridze, Dijkstra should be your staring point.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @CipollaMatthew
Ive been on a philosophy of physics and meta-ethics/jurisprudence bender but Dijkstra definitely maps on to Lagrangian modeling somehow
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.