If you were a bit non-partisan, you could realize that Parmenides assimilated Heraclitean thesis, time became the view from nowhen.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @LStalewski
Obviously he was a spiritual pervert too
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Any philosopher worth his mettle is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes. Which is why I prefer mystics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Mystics? I thought you are just a good sci methodological skeptic. You lost all your clouts in one flash of combustion.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
I’m just restating what I’ve already said. Parmenides was a philosopher. Heraclitus was a mystic. Not sure why you think it’s some sort of dirty word.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What is exactly a mystic, the one who accesses to the gnosis, the one who an inner experience or what?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
“A person... who believes in the spiritual apprehension of truths that are beyond the intellect” i.e. time
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's just intellectual intuition. Sorry, we have to go different ways. I wish you the greatest luck.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don’t. We are enemies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's even better.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.