Never though of it this way! But, yes—I think that's right. (Not sure if I'm going all in on your reduction to Hume, but obviously in the end it's all footnotes to Plato.) If only, um, Wittgenstein had talked about AI at all. It's not like he didn't have the opportunity!
You can even go further without risking pancomputationalism and replace the term evolution with computation as Samson Abramsky does.
-
-
So we’re all functionalists in the end, I guess? And just have a scientific problem (and maybe an identification one.)
-
I think so, but we should ask exactly what kind of functionalists are we?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.