The greatest AI philosophers:
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
Literally Wittgenstein gets a zero. There’s even a set of seminar transcripts where he condescends to Alan Turing (Zettel, I think.)
3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @SimonDeDeo @NegarestaniReza
Yeah I'm pretty upset about the inclusion of Wittgenstein here. There is literally no philosopher less interested in the question 'what underlies intelligent behavior'
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
BS. Wittgenstein understood that AI is the link between philosophy and math. Turing was Wittgenstein's pupil. Wittgenstein's Tractatus preempts the logicist program of AI by several decades, the Investigations describe its failure, years before Minsky and Church even start it.
3 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Simon DeDeo Retweeted Patrick Lee Miller
I liked Patrick's remarks on this.https://twitter.com/Plato4Now/status/1247580339293302784?s=20 …
Simon DeDeo added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SimonDeDeo @Plinz and
PS you all, why doesn't Putnam get the win on this? Invents functionalism, then explains why it doesn't work.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Have no clue, is it because his first name is Hilary or is it because his diagonal argument is too tortuous?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
On that note, here is one of the best defenses of Putnam: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/12096/1/solput.pdf …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.