The greatest AI philosophers:
-
-
I think
@Plinz solve this below. re. rule-following paradox, it is a far reaching paradox not limited to the possibility of an AGI and in my view puts a much needed pressure over certain uncritical appraisals of the Bedeutungskörper, which affects what would we understand by AI. -
Without it, we can´t really have the PVP model of Brandom's Between Saying and Doing, that informs a model of agency wherein doings get the upper hand over available meanings.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes well this whole conversation imo is contingent on the hypothetical a priori of Wittgenstein, which is bifurcated; e.g. in the processes of optical design arrangement in the process of creating an algorithm with which to design the basin of a Peaucillier mechanism,
-
finding the orientation of any optimal arrangement lies in restricting our attention to the possibilities of representation. Searching for an optimal sizing vis-à-vis proper setting for physical modelings, we select a space of restricted possibilities
- 29 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.