The greatest AI philosophers:
That's just Brandomian version which only touches at the surface of what interaction, confrontation of elementary syntactic actions, is or entails.
-
-
It doesnt matter who said it, its the same move that can be expanded from room-to-world but still is a different treatment of performed syntax vs what Searle meant; having read these pages in I&S many times and written an article about your response to Searle,
-
I just dont see how the many mansions response doesnt contain this “broadening” move you claim qua semantics emerging out of minimal syntactic rules of confrontation-cum-basic axiomatic acts
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.