-
-
Replying to @great_old_ones_
I love how you U/Acc crowds willfully and sneakily elide the distinction between Brandom-Hegel and Habermas. Bravo.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @great_old_ones_
Anything wrong with old Jurgen though?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anti_minotaur @great_old_ones_
Jurgen's communicative paradigm is far less adequate than Sellars-Brandom pragmatism. The function of language is not communication, rationality is not communicative, it's the confrontation of inferential actions.
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Meanwhile U/Acc fragmentation paradigm via junior high school tectonics metaphor:pic.twitter.com/Q5xQKS4Syy
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Doesn't it look so cool and libidinal kids?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @great_old_ones_
I've though about trying to actually make a *good* case for the fragmentation thing. I can't see a way to make it work but on the other hand I don't think they're even trying very hard.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I'm of course kidding, I think this fragmentation paradigm should be elaborated. For now, it's like something something Deleuzian patchwork.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @great_old_ones_
I do think the fundamentals are interesting, at least sometimes. The history of the natural world has involved a progressive articulation, like the growth of a fractal, such that it would be bizarre if it culminated in a new unity. But this is hard to square with *our* history.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.