oh you mean I shouldn't read his erotic stuffs?:(
-
-
Replying to @Trashwomann @NegarestaniReza
there are some short stories he wrote in the style of some Japanese masters. they're good and very much erotic.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lesoiseauxduml @Trashwomann
I was going to say that this is another sign of his macho-ness, idolizing xenophobic, anti-modern, imperial puritans like Mishima.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @Trashwomann
Yes. but Reza, if you look through them with just your own ethics, you can cut down every male writer in the history. which is an honorable mission one must say. Mishima has its own merits. the thing is these figures normally do great with gnostic types, if you know what i mean.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
there's a certain charm around them. that exact charm is also around somebody like Bataille or, if you want to push the wheel all the way through, even around Nietzsche.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
do you hold that 'bad' people cannot be 'good' writers?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lesoiseauxduml @Trashwomann
They surely have literally merits, but I think that gnostic charm or aura is dangerous. It's not exclusive to these people, Jack London as a staunch communist was even worse. There is an underlying themes among all these people.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
they psychologize or misappropriate things which are supposed to be impersonal. But there are tons of male writers who remain aloof to their ideologies when writing books or systematically shed their psychologism as they become mature.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @Trashwomann
Couldn't agree more that sheddig psychologism is the main step towards literary maturity. But on this notion of personal-impersonal, idk. It itself is a political dichatomy at best. Otherwise what "personal" isn't extremly impersonal. I mean how much unique a person can be anyway
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lesoiseauxduml @Trashwomann
No it is not a political dichotomy, it is a neuro-philosophical injunction. The point is not to jettison the self or uniqueness of personality in a colloquial sense, but to disentangle it from the psycho-pathologies of the self and personhood which have political ramifications.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.