-
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
It’s ON SIGHT for Pango hmm, don’t blame you Reza! Get well soon, please write some dank shit when you feel better
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CNoumena
You too, the time of pure cuteness has ended, it's now the time of onslaught. I have been talking with friends who are working on this in the Middle East. The news are horrifying, people are mysteriously dying because there is no test. Soon we will get that in the US too.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
Reza i actually wanted to ask if it is the disease we should be scared of or if we should be more concerned about inadequate infrastructure? Thoughts?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CNoumena
IMO we should be scared of the disease. Badiou thinks it's just another pandemic like AIDS or the SARS epidemic. But no this is faster, more contagious and less deadly which means it will put so much strain on everything that even healthy people with other conditions might die.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @CNoumena
When such a pandemic hits, no matter what kind of infrastructure you have, it will crack and the resources will be depleted quickly.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @CNoumena
When the so-called Spanish flu hit, people began to say war depleted our resources and ruined our infrastructure No, there was no country--even those which were not at war--that could cope with the consequences.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
This is a very based take Reza, as far as accelerationism goes how can corona be viewed? Is this something neorationalism has a theoretical grasp of? As in how we manage viral threats enhances our knowledge to deal with these problems?
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @CNoumena
Neorationalism is not exactly about what we should do in the realm of political imaginnation but methods we can apply to get there. We need to ask ourselves, what if the world won't be the same tomorrow? What kind of world then it ought to be? Do have the means and the methods?
1 reply 3 retweets 8 likes
Imagining that kind of after-world I think is beyond the scope of neorationnalism, it requires so many other ingredients --political, imaginative, social reformatting, etc.-- that we currently lack.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.