and I think something like AlphaZero could be applied to, say, corporate processes and/or trading in order to automate a huge chunk of the economy.
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @baroquespiral and
Oh yes, let's apply board game logic to economy and beyond. What can go wrong, maybe just a few charlatans get caught, but the rest will be thriving.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @baroquespiral and
absolutely see no reason why a corporate process couldn't be seen as a very simple board game
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @baroquespiral and
If you had a morsel of familiarity with theoretical computer science, you could see that every board game is a subset of a larger one. Computation is all about the range of interactions, not all of them can be treated within the game theoretic framework orscenarios of competition
5 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @cyborg_nomade and
The whole point of alphago was to demonstrate superhuman performance in an uncomputably large state space.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @higherOrderNet @NegarestaniReza and
Also, see the universal approximation theorem.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @higherOrderNet @cyborg_nomade and
No you are making things up. What does superhuman ability even mean? Does a god who can smell a broad range of smells is superhuman? If yes, you should be more context-sensitive rather than than all over the place.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @higherOrderNet and
You seem to misunderstand universal approximation theorem as truly universal. No, this only applies to certain functions which fall under polynomials constrained by Lebesgue measure. There are different types of functions which don't follow this pattern.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @higherOrderNet and
I mean just because there is a word universal there, you shouldn't think it as Universal. that's 101 semantics.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @cyborg_nomade and
I'm pretty sure Q-Learning meets those requirements but I will verify.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I think you are a very smart but you are doing that old scientist genius mistake. No, there is no comprehensive model, universal paradigm or global method. You should actually be very suspicious of such things.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @cyborg_nomade and
Aww ur a smart boi 2 ;) But I think the brain is an example we can look to as a proof of concept. With enough time and brain power, we tend to figure things out.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @higherOrderNet @cyborg_nomade and
If brain could vet the proof of all concepts, we were already on Mars. Metzinger 101.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.