When I hear about 'non-linear' time, I want to reach for my axe deodorant. How did you interpret linear to begin with?
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
Imagine: a skyscraper with so many vast interconected levels. You are trapped inside this elevator that goes alongside 1d axis-shaft one level by one level and the door never opens, a voice just announces where you are Time as accumilation from past to future, linear like space.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lesoiseauxduml @NegarestaniReza
Non-linear = possibility of wormholes, Time as the intensity of dynamics
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lesoiseauxduml @NegarestaniReza
The difference between a set of "points" of time that can be added-up vs. vector-spaces of time over complex numbers. (Hahahaha)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lesoiseauxduml @NegarestaniReza
Here enters the Lemurian timewars.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lesoiseauxduml @NegarestaniReza
Also one can ask, what do you mean when you say time, do you mean causality?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lesoiseauxduml
Let me get back to you tomorrow, it's now tine to drink and watch a movie :)
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @lesoiseauxduml
No time as a flow of discrete events, i.e. temporality. And yes, traditional accounts of causation are very much built on the flow of time, even though implicitly.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
The chapter on Boltzmann in I&S might give more details. Essentially, time-stamps are analytic by nature, the synthetic content is not given in the nature of time itself.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
reading the said chapter today, it's amazing.
you should consider writing some extraterrestrial sci-fi sir.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
