Yes, it's just akin to a conversation between a rationalist and someone who believes in god in this or that guise.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @Outsideness and
Nature might as well be a God (Gnon). The more we try to understand it's rules, the higher the probability of reward.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @higherOrderNet @NegarestaniReza and
Whether it's a mindless God or not is irrelevant to this statement.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @higherOrderNet @NegarestaniReza and
God is omnipresent? Reality is omnipresent. God is omnipotent? Reality not only can, but does do everything that can be done. God is omniscient? Reality is already the thing which is to be known.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Baalren @higherOrderNet and
Except that the blind idea of reality is as much idiotic as the belief in a God.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @Baalren and
you really (haha) think there's no reality at all?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @Outsideness and
A futile place for this debate to become stuck considering the rejection of reality as given is in a sense an arbitrary choice that characterises the Hegelian/pragmatist/negarestanian position. It’s an ethical choice about the kind of philosophy you want to conduct, rather than..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm still hedging my philosophical funds.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @Outsideness and
Look if I were you I would go with my interpretation of you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UsernameGuy3 @Outsideness and
That's a bad investment my friend.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.