It's the most likely probability, though given James' history, an extra bit of fraud wouldn't surprise me.
-
-
Replying to @KenjiSiratori
And I'm guessing a good chunk of those returns never saw you, given the history of Creation.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KenjiSiratori @VideoFemme
I'm pretty sure James Havoc was his pen name.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @KenjiSiratori
Likely after the havoc he caused for his authors.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VideoFemme @KenjiSiratori
I was so eager to publish with them, but Matthew Stokoe told me that no, this is the worst idea.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @KenjiSiratori
Seems like some great advice. That said I'd do some pretty shady stuff to get published anywhere, so I can't say I'd be above taking whatever comes my way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VideoFemme @KenjiSiratori
I was so desperate that I could take any offer, but if you believe in your work, don't go with shady offers.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @KenjiSiratori
To be honest, I'm always an impulsive decision away from self-publishing, especially because so many of my works are short and thus conducive to a zine environment. I could never do the long complex philosophy stuff you do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It doesn't matter. Refine them as much as you can and no don't self-publish.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @KenjiSiratori
You wouldn't happen to know any British publishers of short experimental writing, would you?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.