isn't cyborg nomade making the same appeal to authority with Physics?
-
-
the authority a physical law yields isn't a credential.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
so what, are you doing all these experiments in your basement? you're not, you trust the scientific method, and when research using that method turns out one way or another you accept it...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
sure, and?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
idk, sounds like research doesn't really support the particular physics you were describing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
is there evidence against universal expansion?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
there's a good question for Reza
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Who, what, where?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
evidence against universal expansion?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Now you are playing tricks you scallywag. How am I supposed to answer your question if you have already settled that within the framework of a speculative physical theory, all evidences support it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The real question is that 'Are this theory's formal and conceptual resources realy adequate to accomodate and explain these evidences?' As long as the foundational concepts are contested, you can plug in any evidence and still get some decent theory about the fate of the universe
-
-
we're talking about standard cosmology here. is there any new theory out there that fundamentally contradicts even the concepts of the standard model of physics applied to large-scale objects?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is not standard cosmology as if it were real in your sense. It's only standard in terms of canonical physical theories we have 'at this point'. This is your contradiction: reality is there and you can't change it, but also there are theories which adequately reveal reality.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.