You really not good at this or understanding science, are you?
-
-
Addiction to games of immediacy (in philosophy of logic & science) can be cured by understanding “Husserl and the Search for Certitude”, Kolakowski’s critique of phenomenology:https://books.google.com/books?id=VKEHAAAACAAJ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What are you talking about, truly?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Your stupid game of reducing objects to intellectual conditions of the person thinking about them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If you actually knew what objectivity means, we could be the best pals. But no you are not because you really don't understand the basics. GTFOH!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The difference of objects from your objectivity is not constituted by your objectivity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What are you saying? Are you that desperate?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Are there limits to the comedy and tragedy possible with idealist epistemology? I doubt it.

1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm sure you are smart person, but this comment is rather dumb and inarticulate. Don't you think so?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Idealist Error: Objects require objectivity, therefore all objects must reduce to logic of the subject-objectivity. Even Hegel granted Gnon must somehow let go/free his willed creations, when ‘leaping’ from Logic to Nature. At least Hegel admitted he barely understood himself.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
object =/= objectivity. Objectivity is something that comes from the the systematic abolishment of psychologism.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.