Yes, that's true but given the complete erosion of the social structure in Iran, the kind of transition we have in mind might not only be tricky but also unfeasible.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @cthulhu_sama
When it comes to something like a constitution, i think It'sn't so much about the erosion of the structure, than the structures that have never been there. The situational relations between land, production and even some basic concept like social compromise need 2B addressed here
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Otherwise, we're just trapped in a vicious cycle of despotism in orded to hold the concept"Iran" togeyhet. Even using some term like bourgeoisie to describe "the middle class" in iran i think is prolematic. You're faced with wealthy land-owners, next to nothing re production.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
At the present situation, the accumulation of capital and arms are so concentrated in certain areas of the society, and the class structure resembles something along the line of all religious empires of the past(from sassanids to safavids etc)/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
/That simply putting forward a solution for post-IRI transmformation without thinking about what this 'nation' really is, sounds a bit delusional tbh.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lesoiseauxdumal @cthulhu_sama
I have some ideas about these but too lazy to type. We can Skype though now.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @cthulhu_sama
Sure. Will call you in a short while
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lesoiseauxdumal @cthulhu_sama
Let me get some grapefruit juice first.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
this is 10AM
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.