Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
NegarestaniReza's profile
Reza Negarestani
Reza Negarestani
Reza Negarestani
@NegarestaniReza

Tweets

Reza Negarestani

@NegarestaniReza

Creator of a blunt object known as Intelligence and Spirit https://tinyurl.com/s7e226j  (Urbanomic/Sequence).

CT
toyphilosophy.com
Joined December 2019

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Reza Negarestani‏ @NegarestaniReza Feb 14
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Anyone thinking wholes and parts are ontic categories is either a fraudester or a stupid philosopher (i.e. doubly fraudster). There is no such ontic categories. You construct new wholes to reveal the underlying fragments, you glue the fragments to uncover new wholes ad infinitum.

      24 replies 19 retweets 228 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Reza Negarestani‏ @NegarestaniReza Feb 14
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      And yes this is one of those pieces I have in mind among some others:https://jacobitemag.com/2019/07/15/disintegration/ …

      3 replies 2 retweets 54 likes
      Show this thread
    3. MF DOOMER‏ @chrish420 Feb 14
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @NegarestaniReza

      Here reza, have a bone to gnaw on: "ontic differentiation is not itself anything ontic."

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    4. Reza Negarestani‏ @NegarestaniReza Feb 14
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @chrish420

      What does that even mean?

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    5. Reza Negarestani‏ @NegarestaniReza Feb 14
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @NegarestaniReza @chrish420

      Are you implying that distinguishing revisable ontic categories is an epistemic affair. If so, that's what I was implying.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. MF DOOMER‏ @chrish420 Feb 14
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @NegarestaniReza

      No Im implying that the act of distinguishing is exactly not an epistemic affair.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Reza Negarestani‏ @NegarestaniReza Feb 14
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @chrish420

      What is it then? Details are required.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Nicolas D Villarreal‏ @NicolasDVillar1 Feb 14
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @NegarestaniReza @chrish420

      Radical nominalism perhaps? Any kind of scientific theory includes this kind of pointing towards external phenomena, including matter and the relations between matter. In order to compare our abstract categories with reality, we must "name" it.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Nicolas D Villarreal‏ @NicolasDVillar1 Feb 14
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @NicolasDVillar1 @NegarestaniReza @chrish420

      not unlike how a painter names different curves and shades through the act of imitating their reference.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Reza Negarestani‏ @NegarestaniReza Feb 15
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @NicolasDVillar1 @chrish420

      This is neither the matter of how a painter names different curves, nor is it a matter of corroborating claims with reality. Science doesn't need the notion of reality to progress. In fact all such notions create a cognitive fog which is unhelpful? What do you mean by reality ...

      2:18 PM - 15 Feb 2020
      • 1 Like
      • Katerina Kolozova
      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Nicolas D Villarreal‏ @NicolasDVillar1 Feb 15
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @NegarestaniReza @chrish420

          Science does need the notion of reality to progress. This is all the more evident in the cosmological debates. If we were only battling out on the matter of epistemological problems we could never go beyond the ideological battle of atheism vs Christian teleology

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Nicolas D Villarreal‏ @NicolasDVillar1 Feb 15
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @NicolasDVillar1 @NegarestaniReza @chrish420

          it was only in the naming of a concrete thing, in the discovery of redshifts, of other galaxies, and the cosmic microwave background, that could make progress beyond that deadlock.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. 5 more replies
        1. Reza Negarestani‏ @NegarestaniReza Feb 15
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @NegarestaniReza @NicolasDVillar1 @chrish420

          ...Like some underlying stuff out there on to which we project structures (the most perceptive form of realism). Realism should designate neutral stuff, but then if it is about neutrality then why sweat over it?

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info