Anyone thinking wholes and parts are ontic categories is either a fraudester or a stupid philosopher (i.e. doubly fraudster). There is no such ontic categories. You construct new wholes to reveal the underlying fragments, you glue the fragments to uncover new wholes ad infinitum.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
When are you going to address the hauntology of shrimping?
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @xBrucexRussellx
He is referring to the work of cyberpunk author Martin von Ligma, I think
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @great_old_ones_ @xBrucexRussellx
Sorry I thought he was talking about some mum fetish.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @great_old_ones_ @xBrucexRussellx
I never doubt you. After all, you are a mum expert.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @xBrucexRussellx
After allpic.twitter.com/q16zzZIjPn
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @great_old_ones_ @xBrucexRussellx
My real data are more up-to-date since I have been having one those 'infamous skypes' with your mom.
1 reply
1 retweet
8 likes
-
-
My God, Reza, you absolute master
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.