Anyone thinking wholes and parts are ontic categories is either a fraudester or a stupid philosopher (i.e. doubly fraudster). There is no such ontic categories. You construct new wholes to reveal the underlying fragments, you glue the fragments to uncover new wholes ad infinitum.
Are you implying that distinguishing revisable ontic categories is an epistemic affair. If so, that's what I was implying.
-
-
No Im implying that the act of distinguishing is exactly not an epistemic affair.
-
What is it then? Details are required.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.