Thinking that making a plethora of fundamental ontologies can address or even touch upon the issues of climate change is most probably the most puerile of all philosophical misadventures.
-
-
Ohhhh, thanks for clarifying, agree with this. Also thanks for the Grunbaum recommendation, anything in particular by him?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, one last question - isn’t ontological postulation a semantic inevitability when it comes to successfully addressing any issue on the same scale as climate change? Doesn’t the act of addressing or touching upon the issues of climate change require an ontology?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.