I think this distinction is predicated on something more fundamental. As long as sex and gender are being an object of exploitation, your point is true. But imagine a different scenario where they are not objects of exploitation.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
Maybe. Doesn't make the the initial point less ridiculous.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @anti_minotaur
My point is that we are not having a good take on exploitation meaning we either see it everywhere as a metaphysical paradigm or we we treat it extremely arbitrarily.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
Fair enough! Let's not let the vomit-inducing ancap nonsense drag us down.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anti_minotaur @NegarestaniReza
How did we get “ancap bad” out of all this
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @specularanomaly @NegarestaniReza
The stuff you're quoting in the OP is very obviously coming from a place of deeply naive lolbertarianism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anti_minotaur @NegarestaniReza
Yeah no I think they’re just a left liberal in my experience. Which is bad as can be already. No need to sully the good name of ancapistan.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @specularanomaly @NegarestaniReza
Afaik they're explicitly a market anarchist. I guess I could be wrong though!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anti_minotaur @NegarestaniReza
Boy are you gonna be disappointed when you find out about me!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @specularanomaly @NegarestaniReza
I've made my peace with acc people's parochial lolbertarian faith as long as they're not stupid.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Fair enough. But my dear friends, I think you are talking past each other. This medium is not great to talk about such issues.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.