-
-
Replying to @interpretantion
Isn't this one of the central questions of process philosophy where the distinction lies in dedifferentiating between occurrence-types?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
I've actually never heard of this concept before about de-differentiating occurence-types. I'll have to read up.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @interpretantion
You see initially when speculative process metaphysics took off the ground, the idea was simple: when we talk about works (ergeiai) or activities, we are actually talk about different types of occurrences, some belong to energeiai and some to kinesis (movement).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @interpretantion
This Aristotelian thesis became the cornerstone of process metaphysics minus the bloated Aristotelianism of Scholsticism. If you are interested to look at this issue: then read Seibt, Vendler and Kenny
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Alternatively for a detailed account on how process philosophy and occurrence-types can be elaborated through potentiality1, potentiality2, actuality1 and actuality2, look at this collection: Process Theories: Crossdisciplinary Studies in Dynamic Categories.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.