I have to revisit my papers to do that. But the references I posted just now should be sufficient. I did make a diagram instead of a conventional syllabus. Let me find it for you.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
What's the minimum needed for understanding lyapunov exponents thoroughly? Real analysis?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @interpretantion
That's a difficult question. How much are you well-versed in the area of applied math? If you want to go easy just read Philosophy of Complex Systems.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @interpretantion
Lyapunov and Anosov in dynamic system analysis are considered to be two annoying abut essential references. You can easily get a gist of their work but if you like the detailed info, you should absolutely know some basics.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza
It sounds like I should practice literacy on some kind of calc textbook and then wade through their papers when the notation feels a bit more second nature
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @interpretantion @NegarestaniReza
My strategy up until now was to just bypass dynamical systems by looking for a more nuanced ontology, I tend to agree with Robert Rosen that the concept of state has led to some carelessness
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @interpretantion
That's great but the realm of applied math is far different from pure math. It's not scarier, it's more rewarding.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
For now, just entertain yourself, Solve as much calculus equations possible. This will get you to the next level.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.