Sorry haters you get into cybernetic when you don't know about complexity theory or computer science. Get a complex-comp partner please.
-
-
-
Replying to @noxaxis1
You see Cybernetics is a powerful schematics. I used to work at a factory as a dynamic system analyst so I know how useful it is to frame all bits and pieces of your knowledge about a system. But just like any powerful schema there is a risk of overgenerizaltion.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @noxaxis1
It's akin to these democratic objects ontology stuff. Just as you don't get infinite milage from withdrawn objects, you don't get an infinite instruction from general notions of positive feedback and flows. The danger of hypostasizing remains.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @noxaxis1
I see 2nd order cybernetics as a proto-interactionist paradigm of looking at systems and technical objects. Yet cybernetics on its own can't address detailed issues about interactions and formal learning etc. Things like issues around true concurrency are bugbears of cybernetics.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @noxaxis1
I know that issues around asynchronous processing in the concurrency sense are being studied by cyberneticians, but they are still far more rudimentary than how theoretical computer science approaches the issues of interaction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If you are interested I highly suggest the basics: Petri, Rob Milner, Dijkstra.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.