Sorry haters you get into cybernetic when you don't know about complexity theory or computer science. Get a complex-comp partner please.
-
-
It's akin to these democratic objects ontology stuff. Just as you don't get infinite milage from withdrawn objects, you don't get an infinite instruction from general notions of positive feedback and flows. The danger of hypostasizing remains.
-
I see 2nd order cybernetics as a proto-interactionist paradigm of looking at systems and technical objects. Yet cybernetics on its own can't address detailed issues about interactions and formal learning etc. Things like issues around true concurrency are bugbears of cybernetics.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed, Do you think there's a risk of you overgeneralising the power of computer science here?
-
Yes the same holds true about computer science. In the original post, I mentioned complexity theory and comp. science. The latter however is quite diverse. When you get into theoretical computer science, you notice that it is more like how physics tried to be the unifying field.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.