The scale sensitivity in physics is not a straightforward issue. There is simply no canonical way of differentiating scales. This used to be scale length but that has already been questioned extensively. The important thing is normalization technique.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @thomasmurphy__
Such that in a specific context you distinguish scaleacg to the composition, laws, predictability, etc.) and only then you create technique to bridge these scales.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @thomasmurphy__
Sorry, typing on the phone. I meant: Such that in a specific context you distinguish scales with regard to ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @thomasmurphy__
what about the “qualitative image of eternity” might be the question
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @summacontra @thomasmurphy__
This is just too vague. You need to unpack it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @thomasmurphy__
I feel that if I respond i’ll be mauled with your rationalist cudgel.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @summacontra @thomasmurphy__
I'm so sorry. I really didn't meant to create a show force. Please speak up.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @thomasmurphy__
I’ve mentioned this before to murph, but the problem of historical time in the phenomenological tradition. The distinction between countable vs numerable.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Husserl is a god, well the early one.
-
-
He got me at Logical Investigations
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.