I think this is beyond my pay grade.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @thomasmurphy__
I very much like to say I don't want get into trouble by answering your question.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @thomasmurphy__
Yet I think your question is confused. You just don't get to ask this question without the specific context. It's like asking when it comes to equations of motions, do you endorse the geocentric or the heliocentric system? These are under defined problems / questions.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @thomasmurphy__
Right right, but then you feel eeky for asking that stupid question on twitter.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @thomasmurphy__
The scale sensitivity in physics is not a straightforward issue. There is simply no canonical way of differentiating scales. This used to be scale length but that has already been questioned extensively. The important thing is normalization technique.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NegarestaniReza @thomasmurphy__
Such that in a specific context you distinguish scaleacg to the composition, laws, predictability, etc.) and only then you create technique to bridge these scales.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Both the recognition of what counts as a scale and what it takes to bridge them (normalization) is a matter of theorization and the introduction new counterfactual elements such as unobservables.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.