a side-effect of universal peer-review: everybody steals your ideas in computer science: http://retractionwatch.com/2018/01/15/meet-scientist-whose-ideas-stolen-least-three-times/ …pic.twitter.com/nqyAdI2HzK
Show this thread
Colleagues of mine had a similar experience. They submitted to some place and got rejected. Three months later, the reviewer rejecting them at the time had published a very similar work. No disclaimer whatsoever. In retrospect, it was a big mistake not to arXiv it first.
-
-
I'll emphasize it was not 100% plagiarized. I hypothesize the reviewer had something very similar up in their barrel, most likely developed independently, but they did seize the opportunity to delay my friends' publication and get ahead of them ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.