Nature Reviews GeneticsOvjeren akaunt

@NatureRevGenet

Publishing reviews and commentaries across the fields of genetics and genomics. Tweets are from the editors.

London, UK
Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @NatureRevGenet

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @NatureRevGenet

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    Our February 2020 issue is live: Topics include molecular properties of promoters and enhancers; genetics of human ageing; cis-acting long non-coding RNAs; and the interplay between mobile genetic elements and host defence systems

    Poništi
  2. Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    for 1 month: Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers by , Jacob Tome &

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    a great review for both beginners and experienced researchers in the field of

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    The working culture of scientific research can be toxic. This perspective explores what the problems are, and what some of the solutions may be.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. Features used to distinguish promoters and enhancers from our recent Review "Determinants of enhancer and promoter activities of regulatory elements", featured on our February cover

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Editorial: As the United Kingdom leaves the EU, the future of a research relationship must be built on continued collaboration and compromise.

    Poništi
  8. Original articles: Lee, J.-S. & Mendell, J. T. Mol. Cell (2020) Lai, F. et al. Mol. Cell (2020)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. Two new studies in report a role for antisense oligonucleotides in inducing transcriptional termination, with important implications for the interpretation of functional studies of long non-coding RNAs.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Even though there may be a million+ enhancers in the human genome, understanding their role is formidable. And so is this review, by Jacob Tome and A great summary figure

    Poništi
  12. Original article: Blake, L. E. et al. A comparison of gene expression and DNA methylation patterns across tissues and species. Genome Res. (2020)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. A study in reports gene expression and DNA methylation profiles of multiple tissues sampled from the same individuals across humans, chimpanzees and rhesus macaques.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. COMPARATIVE GENOMICS: A primate view of gene expression by

    , , i još njih 2
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. Post, Y. et al. Snake venom gland organoids. Cell 180, 233–247 (2020)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. Original articles: Suryamohan, K. et al. The Indian cobra reference genome and transcriptome enables comprehensive identification of venom toxins. Nat. Genet. 52, 106–117 (2020)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. Two new studies on snake venom glands have implications for improved anti-venom development. One describes the de novo assembly of an Indian cobra reference genome and venom gland transcriptome; the other describes the derivation of snake venom gland organoids.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. GENOMICS: Omics and organoids — a route to improved anti-venom

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    We wrote the review that I wished I'd had when I started my PhD in gene regulation & genomics! Read for our take on the past 40 yrs of enhancer biology, a def of an "enhancer", and how we think modern tech (like CRISPR screens) will enable the next era of understanding the genome

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. While this Review focuses on enhancers, in particular mammalian enhancers, many of the assays and concepts described are potentially applicable to other classes of non-coding DNA regulatory elements.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. If the evidence falls short of this threshold, as it currently does for nearly all candidate enhancers, the authors suggest strong, moderate and weak tiers to describe candidate enhancers with less or conflicting evidence.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·