Magdalena is ruining this mag -- it's entirely rooted in science and based on genetics.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Travis, why're you so basic?
End of conversation
-
-
-
You know genders are defined by the amount of chromosomes a person has...but science
-
Gender has nothing to do with chromosomes. Sex does at most, and then again it's not even 100% related.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
love how many dorks are freaking out about this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
>This proposal has no foundation in science and should be abandoned.pic.twitter.com/8Z2okmCL78
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most of the commenters did obviously not read the article. Otherwise, they wouldn't say stupid stuff like "gender is defined by genitalia" or "XY=male genitalia and XX=female genitalia", since the article clearly states and gives examples on why that's not always the case.
-
Developmental defects during gestation do not mean there are more than two sexes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.