I named a variable wrong, which has no substantive effect on the 'paper ballot' coefficient but flips colplus/black coef. in a sensible waypic.twitter.com/k6va7wF9ui
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I named a variable wrong, which has no substantive effect on the 'paper ballot' coefficient but flips colplus/black coef. in a sensible waypic.twitter.com/k6va7wF9ui
hmm almost like tweeting out a hot-take analysis is not a great idea
i blame the wine, not the heat of the take
a very fair counterpoint
You are using d-shift as dependent variable? Why? That doesn't seem to be their dependent variable. Try with dem margin?
it's the same, though i interpreted their dv to be dshift
I think at this point, they should spill their data. Also, only WI is this close, no, with enough no paper machines?
It looks to me like all electronic voting machines in WI include printer for VVAT https://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/#year/2016/state/55 …
why don't you use R studio?
tools > global options > appearance > editor theme. Don't know which one @Nate_Cohn uses but it's not the default white bg.
thanks! That's why I didn't recognize it
Note that Ron Rivest is advocating audits in several states as well. He's not exactly a tin-foil hat guy either.
are you running this on all counties, or just w/ population <50k, and/or used electronic voting? R output doesn't show n-size.
looks like Nate Silver is restricting by population, so good to know that effect disappears when all counties included
Oh wait. Does output change if you run multiple linear regression for each county? Are there counties where effect isn't null?
Lol you're about 15 minutes behind the other Nate
dun dun dun. Tuesday night, Nate v Nate, stats nerds- go!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.