So, how much of this do you think evaporates after controlling for race and education? 100%? 90%? 80?
-
-
-
@Nate_Cohn everybody's going bonkers - 1 more reply
-
-
-
@Nate_Cohn@jbarro I'm skeptical of claims but *if* the team includes Halderman, that's a different level. Serious, cautious top researcher. -
-
-
@Nate_Cohn@jbarro Alex is among world's top experts in computer security and voting. Cautious person. His name there gives me pause. -
@zeynep@Nate_Cohn@jbarro what about Nate's latest tweet?https://twitter.com/nate_cohn/status/801217804783394816 … -
@jonkimball@Nate_Cohn@jbarro Yep; there should be a range of checks on this. Why the @#!# do we have no-paper machines. Should change. -
@zeynep@Nate_Cohn@jbarro most places are going back to optical machines now
-
-
-
@Nate_Cohn Color me *extremely* skeptical -
@chrislhayes@Nate_Cohn So you guys are saying you don't support recounts in close elections with shocking results? - 1 more reply
-
-
-
@Nate_Cohn@intelligencer What's the point of discouraging a call to investigate something? - 1 more reply
-
-
-
-
@Nate_Cohn which is why campaign isn't acting. MI is down to 9k tho - close enough to recount imo cause why not. WI/PA aren't happening -
-
@JZTessler@Nate_Cohn exactly... if PA was 50k closer, they would be recounting all 3. But without PA, nothing happens. PA won't change. -
@joshuarhicks@Nate_Cohn if they thought there were issues, they would have requested recounts by now. Not based on psuedo-science either -
@JZTessler yep, why I'm not pushing it. I hate Trump but fact is, he won the EC. we'll always have the meaningless popular vote.

-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.