Nate CohnVerified account

So, how much of this do you think evaporates after controlling for race and education? 100%? 90%? 80?

@Nate_Cohn everybody's going bonkers

@Nate_Cohn @jbarro I'm skeptical of claims but *if* the team includes Halderman, that's a different level. Serious, cautious top researcher.

@zeynep @jbarro serious researchers who wade into an area that they know much about can end up saying stupid stuff

@zeynep @jbarro they *don't know

@Nate_Cohn @jbarro Alex is among world's top experts in computer security and voting. Cautious person. His name there gives me pause.

@zeynep @Nate_Cohn @jbarro what about Nate's latest tweet?https://twitter.com/nate_cohn/status/801217804783394816 …

@jonkimball @Nate_Cohn @jbarro Yep; there should be a range of checks on this. Why the @#!# do we have no-paper machines. Should change.

@Nate_Cohn Color me *extremely* skeptical

@chrislhayes @Nate_Cohn So you guys are saying you don't support recounts in close elections with shocking results?

@Nate_Cohn @intelligencer What's the point of discouraging a call to investigate something?

@Nate_Cohn and yet:https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/801210272249708548 …

@Nate_Cohn which is why campaign isn't acting. MI is down to 9k tho - close enough to recount imo cause why not. WI/PA aren't happening

@JZTessler @Nate_Cohn exactly... if PA was 50k closer, they would be recounting all 3. But without PA, nothing happens. PA won't change.

@joshuarhicks @Nate_Cohn if they thought there were issues, they would have requested recounts by now. Not based on psuedo-science either