I say Ossoff is up 3 points in average, but average error in special House elections is 4.5 points. What's your interpretation of that data?
It means there's a 70% chance Ossoff wins and a 30% chance that MATH IS DEAD AND DATA IS BROKEN.
-
-
70/30... Interesting probabilities. Never heard those before...
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
who's the bigger tool: people who say data is dead every time an upset happens, or people who think polling is a crystal ball
-
The people who ask who the bigger tool is, are the bigger tools
-
Aww man! I was gonna guess like an 80 ft Hammer Man. Just smashing buildings with his hammer face.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Hillary is still up by 20 points
-
Omg!! Hilarious
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@NateSilver538 WRONG...AGAIN!!!! FOLD UP SHOP SILVER!!! HANDEL WON!!!!pic.twitter.com/CRROn7Hmim -
Yay!!!!!!!!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This didn’t age well. Or did the Russians tamper with the data?
-
The Russians hacked both the voting machines and James Hodgkinson's brain...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You still predicting elections? You have been 100% wrong a 100% of the time over the last year. find a new job.
-
Imagine the horror of statisticians learning that people are not passive numbers...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
How do you still have a job? Seriously lol. MAGA!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
-
Damn son- Are you paid to just put out dishonest polling to help drive democrat fundraising? Silver is totally discredited
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.