Clinton should have campaigned more in MI, WI, which 538 model often ranked among tipping-point states. But it didn't cost her the election.
-
-
So if you're going to second-guess, a way better question is whether Clinton needed a better October Surprise response strategy.
-
They were caught very flat-flooted on the Comey letter. Not an easy thing to respond to, but they didn't have much of a strategy at all.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
nailed it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if not for BS media bias and being a massively flawed candidate she lose by more.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For people who think that Russia/Comey weren't a game changer, read this tweet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe she should have fessed up about the email in 2015 instead of letting it dog her for 18 months.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's cool, though; we'll just have a do-over. Someone hit the reset switch. We saved at the last checkpoint, right? 0_o
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
comey/russia were self inflicted wounds, i.e. foundation, email server, DNC/MSM hack of election were all her doing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Comey/Russia didn't force HRC to be an incredibly flawed candidate with more scandals than ideas. She did that herself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.