To follow: some *very* quick analysis which suggests the claim here of rigged results in Wisconsin is probably BS:
Conversation
Run a regression on Wisc. counties with >=50K people, and you find that Clinton improved more in counties with only paper ballots. HOWEVER:
52
352
300
...the effect COMPLETELY DISAPPEARS once you control for race and education levels, the key factors in predicting vote shifts this year.
Maybe a more complicated analysis would reveal something, but usually bad news when a finding can't survive a basic sanity check like this.
89
234
449
Nothing in Pennsylvania, either, whether or not you control for demographics.
48
176
197
Show replies
and an audit would certainly tell us whether your quick model was worth a damn this time
3
3
72
Audits aren't cheap just to find out what we speculate.
Your polling showed that Clinton had a higher than 50% chance to win the election and you were wrong. Why trust you now?
2
3
Show replies
How do you know what Alex found without seeing his results and not a leak about his results?
You know better than anyone else that when the numbers & margins are so small probabilities are irrelevant.
1
