You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Not sure Bernie should get credit for having more diverse support than last time given that he has far less support than last time. A lot of voters have left him. White liberals have been particularly likely to leave him (for Warren) so the residue of what's left is more diverse.https://twitter.com/richardmskinner/status/1175580817591955456 …
Put another way, Sanders is doing worse among blacks and Hispanics than in 2016, but he's doing *much* worse among whites, among whom he overperformed last time. That's the sense in which his support is more diverse, not in his actually having made inroads with voters of color.
You know who had diverse support? De Blasio, that's who. He had 0% among whites, 0% among blacks, 0% among Hispanics, 0% among men and 0% among women. 0% among college graduates and 0% among non-college voters. 0% among evangelicals and 0% among LGBTQs. Hard to get more diverse.
71% of Warrens base is WHITE 51% of Sanders base is POC You can not win without POC
Bernie is the reason we have Trump-
"residue"
1 million donors in 7 months Nate, a record, and 2 months quicker than the last time he ran.pic.twitter.com/pNq0Na5yUb
This map has potential to overtake Republicans red map from 2000 in terms of meaninglessness. Bernie is nothing but a small number of donors making multiple donations. As he asks them to.
I'm not sure calling Bernie's remainder of support that happens to be more diverse "residue" is.... *sigh* nevermind, it's nate
Who is paying @NateSilver538 to be so constantly anti Bernie?
This is most certainly part of the $50 million @davidbrockdc said he is putting into 2020. Brockbot Nate Silver.pic.twitter.com/XIMrgTw7z1
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
