There maybe is something to the notion that "hey, the floodgates are open and anyone can compete now, even if they don't have traditional credentials." But the candidates who are surfacing in this way among Ds are *very* un-Trumplike. Buttigieg. Yang, maybe. Abrams if she runs.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, and they were all stupid.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the day Avenatti became president.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They’re going to pivot to Howard Schultz
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do we have to do avenatti again? I mean, we can all choose not to. So let's not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nate, there is still time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I recall you jokingly saying that "you're going to vote for him!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They were literally only HIS thoughts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No less a pundit than Chris Cilizza of CNN opined that we had to take his possible candidacy "seriously." https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/13/politics/avenatti-trump-2020-president/index.html …
-
I'm pretty sure Chris Cilizza is the least pundit CNN must get a $1 for every point he raises a Dem's blood pressure with his hackish takes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.