You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
These are the worst rankings I've ever seen in any sport, ever. NCAA needs to go completely back to the drawing board.https://twitter.com/marchmadness/status/1067105577661276160 …
FIRST EVER NET RANKINGS
1. Ohio State
2. Virginia
3. Texas Tech
4. Michigan
5. Gonzaga
6. Duke
7. Michigan State
8. Wisconsin
9. Virginia Tech
10. Loyola Marymount
FULL Rankings 1-353:
https://on.ncaa.com/2BxpVJk pic.twitter.com/XQtckLdtCi
The big problem seems to be that only 1 of the 5 components (not sure why there are 5 components instead o 1 cohesive rating) considers strength of schedule. So it rewards team with good records against very poor schedules. Probably won't get much better as the year goes along.pic.twitter.com/WTzqcaW6Qr
This is incompetently designed. It's worse than RPI. Worse than the eye test. It could make a total shitshow of the NCAA tourney for a couple years and cost the NCAA millions by devaluing its most valuable franchise. It's why you never want to design an algorithm by committee.
Tell us how you really feel
Kinda like your 2016 election polls
Knowing nothing about college sports, but seeing journalists talk about them online, 50/50 chance that this is a badly designed system or that you just don't like the results and went to a rival college.
No it’s really bad. The top 10 is not even close
They do projections before the tournament.
How is it worse than RPI? I'd prefer kenpom or some statistically viable strength of record measure, but 3/4 of RPI was literally the record of your opponents and their opponents.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
